BIMTECH Business Perspectives
group_logo
issue front

Ashwaria Mahajan1 and Sunil Kumar1

First Published 28 Aug 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/25819542251366086
Article Information
Corresponding Author:

Ashwaria Mahajan, Department of Commerce, University of Jammu, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Road, Jammu Tawi, Jammu and Kashmir 180006, India.
Email: mahajan9457@gmail.com; ashwaria.mahajan3@jammuuniversity.ac.in

1 Department of Commerce, University of Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India

cc img

Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-Commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed.

Abstract

In the era of rapid technological advancement, there is a pressing need for adopting responsible innovation (RI) practices due to technology’s adverse impact on society. RI, being a novel concept, provides innovative solutions for addressing ethical, social, and sustainable development (SD) issues. Organizations, due to intractable societal challenges, resort to RI for creating value for stakeholders and establishing governance mechanisms for achieving SD goals. To attain this, a systematic literature review is conducted with an analysis of 48 research articles obtained from the Scopus database between 2003 and 2024. The study uses the Theory–Characteristics–Context–Methodology review framework along with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The study identifies key theories such as the extended resource-based view, stakeholder theory, and principal-agent theory. Moreover, the study discusses the antecedents’ mechanism and its potential outcomes, offering insights to direct enterprises achieve ethical and social integrity with improvement in sustainable performance. Our study contributes to the existing literature and also provides future research directions to expand the available knowledge.

Keywords

Responsible innovation, sustainability, ethics, stakeholder engagement, organization

References

Adomako, S., & Nguyen, N. P. (2023). Green creativity, responsible innovation, and product innovation performance: A study of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(7), 4413–4425. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3373

Adomako, S., & Tran, M. D. (2022). Environmental collaboration, responsible innovation, and firm performance: The moderating role of stakeholder pressure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1695–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2977

Bacq, S., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022). Stakeholder governance for responsible innovation: A theory of value creation, appropriation, and distribution. Journal of Management Studies, 59(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12746

Brand, T., & Blok, V. (2019). Responsible innovation in business: A critical reflection on deliberative engagement as a central governance mechanism. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 6(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1575681

Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2020). Stakeholder governance: Solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 47(2), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0441

Burget, M., Bardone, E., & Pedaste, M. (2017). Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: A literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11948-016-9782-1

Cha, H., & Park, S. M. (2023). Organizational agility and communicative actions for responsible innovation: Evidence from manufacturing firms in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09883-8

Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., & Vrontis, D. (2021). Antecedents and consequence of frugal and responsible innovation in Asia: Through the lens of organization capabilities and culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09797-3

Christofi, M., Khan, H., & Iaia, L. (2022). Responsible innovation in Asia: A systematic review and an agenda for future research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09839-4

Christofi, M., Leonidou, E., & Vrontis, D. (2017). Marketing research on mergers and acquisitions: A systematic review and future directions. International Marketing Review, 34(5), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-03-2015-0100

Cortina, A. (2000). Civil ethics and the validity of law. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009958315067

Cortina, A. (2014). Four tasks for forward-looking global ethics. Journal of Global Ethics, 10(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2014.896574

Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., D’Amore, G., & Tiscini, R. (2024). Responsible innovation and ethical corporate behavior in the Asian fashion industry: A systematic literature review and avenues ahead. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(3), 1129–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09844-7

Do, H., & Shipton, H. (2019). High-performance work systems and innovation in Vietnamese small firms. International Small Business Journal, 37(7), 732–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619863572

Elsevier. (2022). What is Scopus about? Retrieved, 2 August 2025, from https://service.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/15100/supporthub/scopus/related/1/

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. (2016). Framework for responsible innovation. Retrieved, 2 August 2025, from https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/index.cfm/research/framework/

European Commission. (2001). European governance: A white paper. Commission of the European Communities. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do? uri=COM:2001:0428:FIN:EN:PDF

Friedman, B., Harbers, M., Hendry, D. G., van den Hoven, J., Jonker, C., & Logler, N. (2021). Eight grand challenges for value sensitive design from the 2016 Lorentz workshop. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09586-y

Garst, J., Blok, V., Branzei, O., Jansen, L., & Omta, O. S. W. F. (2019). Toward a value-sensitive absorptive capacity framework: Navigating intervalue and intravalue conflicts to answer the societal call for health. Business and Society, 60(6), 1349–1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319876108

Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0341

Iqbal, Q., & Ahmad, N. H. (2021). Sustainable development: The colors of sustainable leadership in learning organization. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2135

Ko, E., Yoon, J., & Kim, Y. (2020). Why do newly industrialized economies deter to adopt responsible research and innovation? The case of emerging technologies in Korea. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 620–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460. 2020.1824667

Kuhlmann, S., & Rip, A. (2014). The challenge of addressing Grand Challenges: A think piece on how innovation can be driven towards the “Grand Challenges” as defined under the prospective European Union Framework Programme Horizon 2020. https://research.utwente.nl/files/5140568/The_challenge_of_addressing_Grand_Challenges.pdf

Landeweerd, L., Townend, D., Mesman, J., & Van Hoyweghen, I. (2015). Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: A contribution to “Responsible Research and Innovation.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0026-y

Lieberman, M. B., Garcia-Castro, R., & Balasubramanian, N. (2017). Measuring value creation and appropriation in firms: The VCA model. Strategic Management Journal, 38(6), 1193–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2565

Lythreatis, S., El-Kassar, A. N., Smart, P., & Ferraris, A. (2022). Participative leadership, ethical climate and responsible innovation perceptions: Evidence from South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09856-3

Memon, K. R., & Ooi, S. K. (2023). Responsible innovation and resource-based theory: Advancing an antecedent-outcome model for large manufacturing firms through structured literature review. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 12(2), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-023-00181-6

Opferkuch, K., Caeiro, S., Salomone, R., & Ramos, T. B. (2021). Circular economy in corporate sustainability reporting: A review of organizational approaches. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4015–4036. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2854

Owen, R., Bessant, J. R., & Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424

Owen, R., Pansera, M., Macnaghten, P., & Randles, S. (2021). Organisational institutionalisation of responsible innovation. Research Policy, 50(1), 104132. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132

Owen, R., von Schomberg, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2021). An unfinished journey? Reflections on a decade of responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 8(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789

Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

Pellé, S. (2016). Process, outcomes, virtues: The normative strategies of responsible research and innovation and the challenge of moral pluralism. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3(3), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1258945

Pellé, S., & Reber, B. (2015). Responsible innovation in the light of moral responsibility. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 15(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.3920/jcns2014.x017

Rome Declaration. (2014). Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe. Retrieved, 2 August 2025, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/rome_declaration_RRI_final_21_November.pdf

Ryan, M., & Blok, V. (2023). Stop re-inventing the wheel: Or how ELSA and RRI can align. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2196151

Schrempf, J. (2012). A social connection approach to corporate responsibility: The case of the fast-food industry and obesity. Business and Society, 53(2), 300–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312449577

Stahl, B. C. (2013). Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 708–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct067

Stahl, B. C. (2024). Critical responsible innovation: The role(s) of the researcher. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2300162

Stahl, B. C., Eden, G., & Jirotka, M. (2013). Responsible research and innovation in information and com munication technology: Identifying and engaging with the ethical implications of ICTs. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 199–218). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch11

Stahl, G. K., & Sully de Luque, M. (2014). Antecedents of responsible leader behavior: A research synthesis, conceptual framework, and Agenda for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0126

Stilgoe, J. (2019). Shared space and slow science in geoengineering research. In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation (pp. 259–270). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718862.00026

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Tan, K. H., & Yamada, T. (2018). A conceptual framework for responsible innovation. Journal of Japanese Management, 3(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.60321/jfmra.3.1_22

Thapa, R. K., Iakovleva, T., & Foss, L. (2019). Responsible research and innovation: A systematic review of the literature and its applications to regional studies. European Planning Studies, 27(12), 2470–2490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1625871

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

United Nations. (2012). The millennium development goals report 2012. Retrieved, 2 August 2025, from https://doi.org/10.18356/32f1e244-en

Valdivia, W. D., & Guston, D. H. (2015). Responsible innovation: A primer for policymakers. The Brookings Institution.

Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190498511.001.0001

Van den Hoven, J. (2013). Value sensitive design and responsible innovation. In Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 75–83). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch4

Van Tongeren, P. (2020). The art of living well: Moral experience and virtue ethics. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Van Veenstra, A. F., van Zoonen, E. A., & Helberger, N. (2021). ELSA Labs for human centric innovation in AI. Netherlands AI Coalition. https://www.readkong.com/page/elsa-labs-for-human-centric-innovation-in-ai-nederlandse-6969863

Von Schomberg, L., & Blok, V. (2021). Technology in the age of innovation: Responsible innovation as a new subdomain within the philosophy of technology. Philosophy and Technology, 34(2), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00386-3

Von Schomberg, L., & Blok, V. (2023). It takes two to tango: Toward a political concept of responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 10(1). https://doi.org/10. 1080/23299460.2023.2264616

von Schomberg, R. (2012). Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. In M. Dusseldorp & R. Beecroft (Eds.), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6_2

von Schomberg, R. (2014). The quest for the “right” impacts of science and technology: A framework for responsible research and innovation. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B. J. Koops, & H. Romijn (Eds.), Responsible innovation 1 (pp. 33–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8956-1_3

Wang, C. (2021). Monopoly with corporate social responsibility, product differentiation, and environmental R&D: Implications for economic, environmental, and social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125433

Xie, X., Wu, Y., & Tejerob, C. B. G. (2024). How responsible innovation builds business network resilience to achieve sustainable performance during global outbreaks: An extended resource-based view. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 12194–12208. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2022.3186000

Zahoor, N., Khan, H., Khan, Z., & Akhtar, P. (2024). Responsible innovation in emerging markets’ SMEs: The role of alliance learning and absorptive capacity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(3), 1175–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09843-8

Zhang, X. E., Teng, X., Le, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). Strategic orientations and responsible innovation in SMEs: The moderating effects of environmental turbulence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2522–2539. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3283


Make a Submission Order a Print Copy